the rebellious marketing blog that challenges conventional thought

rsz_3777748_thumbnailOn Thursday September 24, CQ-Roll Call Group, the media company formed after The Economist Group completed its acquisition of Congressional Quarterly from Times Publishing Co. in August, announced a restructuring that included the elimination of 44 editorial jobs.

There used to be a time when editors were superstars – their name synonymous with an entire industry, their word irrefutable. Who could  have predicated that three letters and their universe would topple this long-standing establishment? The World Wide Web has precipitated a change in the business information landscape, which is not only irreversible but puts in question the very existence of the media industry. As editorial voice gives way to user generated content and peer-to-peer communities, the controlled circulation model of free industry content is becoming increasingly unsustainable financially – en masse editorial staff lay-offs are testament to this new reality. So should you be investing your marketing budget in a dying business model? You can for now, but you really need to start thinking about alternatives. Especially as controlled circulation media owners are ruthlessly compromising their integrity by letting their sponsors and advertisers fill the empty seats of their editorial staff. Free content is now increasingly product-led which – ironically – is only accelerating the decline as their disappointed readers look elsewhere for knowledge.

So is the only reliable knowledge now something that is only available to your target audience on a paid-for, subscription basis? Not necessarily. Companies such as LinkedIn and BrightTALK are changing the knowledge landscape by offering viable and sustainable alternatives to professional audiences and marketers. Importantly, media and business information companies don’t need to die – they just need to reinvent themselves and adapt their business model so their communities don’t abandon their brand. As long as they can deliver engaged audiences, marketing budgets will continue to flow.

So how do I think they can achieve this? By empowering their community to shape content through measurable interactive and rich media experiences and taking a more open approach to their competitive landscape.  B2B media must realize that they don’t OWN communities – they own a database of names that are worthless unless they are engaged and responsive. Their survival will depend on cross-fertilization of communities with other brands and competitors. Their key differentiator will be the vibrancy of their community’s conversation.

8 COMMENTS
Anonymous
September 27, 2009
ad

Very good article, thank you. I’m a publisher at Wiley and we haven’t seen any ebbing in our paid-for subscriptions whereas controlled circulation publications have suffered. I believe there are some areas which are less exposed to the ‘community threat’ than others. Science for example, will always be peer-reviewed and will always want to publish their findings in ‘journals’. Then again though, what’s to say that even this behaviour won’t eventually move into a more open, accessible and free web 2.0 format…

Sarah
September 27, 2009
ad

I have clearly seen this impact the success of campaigns as publication brands enjoy less engagement from their readership as a result of this trend towards peer-to-peer communication. I have found that their eDM lists are responsive though I’m under no illusion that I’m probably part of the audience alienation through ‘vendor overkill’ which you refer to in your article.

BetsyM
September 27, 2009
ad

I don’t necessarily agree that vendor content alienates audiences. There are buyers who are trying to make purchasing decisions and a direct pitch from various vendors can help them establish who best suits their requirements. In that scenario, the ‘direct pitch’ is very useful.

VPG
September 27, 2009
ad

I agree Betsy. I was referring specifically to the scenario where a brand abandons its original ‘raison d’etre’ and sells out because its model is no longer sustainable. THAT alienates audiences. I completely agree that there is a place for product pitches in the buying cycle.

Anonymous
September 29, 2009
ad

I’ve been surprised at how unresponsive media has been to the social networking movement. I do think there is a market for social networks which serve specific professionals – for publishers, this is such an obvious opportunity to get a leg over their competitors. I don’t think there is room for more than one social network per professional community, so there would definitely be consolidation but whoever gets it right will claim market dominance.

JK
October 1, 2009
ad

I agree, the smart media companies will be tomorrow’s social networks.

VPG
October 2, 2009
ad

So what’s the future business model for these ‘social network media companies’? It’s not exactly like social communities are the beacon of revenue models…

Anonymous
October 2, 2009
ad

Good point well made vpg – I think that community in the publisher context could be around content. The audience dictates where it takes the content and advertisers can contextually position their product or thought leadership messaging. Although I know you’re going to say that this is contrary to the whole principle of a community in control of their own turf.

Post a comment