Comments on: Twitter has no revenue model but raises $100 million

By: Lance Spear

Lance Spear — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:16:32 +0000

interesting interview with Twitter founder Evan Williams on this topic here: http://fora.tv/2009/10/21/A_Conversation_with_Twitter_CEO_Evan_Williams#Twitters_Revenue_Model_CEO_Evan_Williams_Responds

By: VPG

VPG — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:24:49 +0000

Yes, absolutely.

By: Polprav

Polprav — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:13:36 +0000

Hello from Russia!
Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you?

By: VPG

VPG — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:35:56 +0000

Can’t argue with that Mike

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:33:43 +0000

Come on guys, IT’S TWITTER! It has completely changed the face of online conversation. Their twitterers are amongst the most engaged users on the web. Of course this is justified. Yes they need to build credible revenue models, but Google didn’t exactly start with one and look where they are now!

By: Julie CK

Julie CK — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:31:54 +0000

Hm, not sure that approach warrants that valuation or investment.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:31:11 +0000

I’m sure they’ll figure something out. Build it and they will come…

By: VPG

VPG — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:29:22 +0000

I’m sure, though to clarify twitter’s revised terms of service state that the content is ‘co-owned’ by you AND Twitter: http://twitter.com/tos

By: YJK

YJK — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:26:16 +0000

This is seriously screwed up – did they not also just announce that they now own all tweets? That might have played a role in their valuation…